
For years, we talked about AI as a software story.
Models. Chips. Algorithms. Talent.
That framing is now outdated. What’s slowing AI down in early 2026 isn’t code — it’s electricity.
The Grid Is Already Straining
Earlier this month, Reuters reported that PJM Interconnection, the largest power-grid operator in the U.S., unveiled emergency measures to deal with AI-driven demand.
The proposal was blunt:
large new power users — read: data centers — may need to bring their own generation or accept limits on when they can draw power.
At the same time, the U.S. Energy Information Administration expects national electricity demand to set new records in 2026 and 2027, driven largely by AI infrastructure.
The system wasn’t built for this.
Big Tech Is Admitting It — Quietly
Google’s engineers have been exploring orbital solar concepts — not because space is trendy, but because Earth’s grid can’t scale fast enough.
Microsoft took a different path: securing long-term baseload power by restarting the Three Mile Island nuclear facility.
Different strategies.
Same conclusion.
AI doesn’t need bursts of energy.
It needs reliable, continuous power, at industrial scale.
Washington Has Stepped In
What changed recently wasn’t a product launch.
It was policy.
Grid operators are under pressure from the White House and state leaders to accelerate capacity auctions and force large power consumers to help fund new generation.
This isn’t climate policy.
It’s infrastructure triage.
Energy has become a national priority again — because without it, the AI roadmap stalls.
Why Nuclear Is Back in the Conversation
Wind and solar help at the margins.
They don’t solve baseload demand.
That’s why nuclear is re-entering the center of the discussion — not as ideology, but as math.
Advanced reactors and restarts are being fast-tracked. But there’s a catch that rarely makes headlines. They don’t run on legacy fuel.
They require HALEU — High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium — a specialized nuclear fuel with extremely limited global supply.
Without HALEU:
new reactors don’t move forward
timelines slip
power plans fail
This isn’t a technology problem.
It’s a supply problem.

Capital Is Following the Constraint
Investors are starting to see it.
According to BlackRock, institutional capital in 2026 is flowing more aggressively into energy and infrastructure than into pure AI software plays. That’s a tell.
When markets move from excitement to execution, bottlenecks matter more than narratives.
Bottom Line
AI didn’t run out of ideas.
It ran into physics.
The next phase of artificial intelligence won’t be decided by who has the best model — but by who controls power, fuel, and infrastructure.
The grid is already under strain.
Nuclear is being pulled back into the system.
And one overlooked fuel now sits at the center of every serious AI energy plan.
This isn’t about hype. It’s about what actually keeps the machines running.
How was this edition?
Warren Blake
Editor-in-Chief, Smart Trade Insights


